Paradox pain sensitivity using cuff pressure or algometer testing in patients with hemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is a common comorbidity in patients with hemophilia (PwH) due to hemophilic arthropathy. This study aims to explore pain sensitivity in PwH methodologically investigating in cuff pressure testing compared to algometer testing. METHODS: 37 PwH and 35 healthy control subjects (Con) enrolled in this study. Joint health status was assessed. Subjective pain was evaluated using numeric rating scales. Pain sensitivity was measured with pressure algometry and cuff pressure algometry. Pressure pain thresholds of the algometer (PPTa) were measured at knee, ankle joints, and forehead. Subsequently, thresholds of cuff pressure were measured at the left and right lower legs (PPTcuff). In both, lower values represent higher pain sensitivity. RESULTS: PwH exerted a worse joint health status than Con. Pain sensitivity was higher in PwH compared to Con as PPTa of the knee and ankle joints were lower in PwH. No difference was observed in PPTa at the forehead. Contrastingly, lower pain sensitivity was detected in PwH by higher PPTcuff values compared to Con in both legs. CONCLUSION: While PPTa of the knee and ankle joints are lower in PwH, PPTcuff are higher in PwH compared to Con. This reveals a paradox situation, highlighting that PwH experience local, joint- and hemophilic arthropathy-related pain, whereas pain sensitivity of non-affected soft tissue structures is lower. The reasons explaining the PPTcuff results remain elusive but might be explained by coping strategies counteracting chronic joint pain, resulting in lower sensitivity at non-affected structures.

Physical activity and factor VIII levels in patients with haemophilia: A real-world prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity (PA) is recommended for patients with haemophilia (PwH). For PwH it is crucial to ensure a sufficient factor level to prevent PA-induced bleedings. However, there is a gap in the literature dealing with specific factor levels, which are needed when performing specific types of PA. AIM: To provide data on factor VIII (FVIII) levels at the start of PA performed by PwH. METHODS: In this prospective 12-month real-world observational study, 23 PwH recorded every PA they performed and the FVIII levels at the start of the PA using a pharmacokinetic application. PA types were clustered according to the collision and injury risk into three categories (Cat I = low, Cat II = medium, Cat III = high risk). Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS) were performed at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: 795 PA sessions of Cat I, 193 of Cat II, and 23 of Cat III were documented. FVIII levels at the start of PA were different between categories (Cat I: 29.8 ± 32.1%, Cat II: 38.3 ± 33.4%, Cat III: 86.6 ± 29.2%). Out of all PA sessions, 145 (14%) were performed at a factor level of ≤3%. Three PA-induced bleeding occurred. Baseline HJHS was 14.5 ± 13.6 points and did not change throughout the study. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-life data on FVIII levels at the start of 1011 PA sessions. PwH are mainly active in low-risk sports with higher FVIII levels observed in Cat II and III, respectively. Only three PA-induced bleeding occurred, even though several PA were started with low FVIII levels.

Smartphone Use-Influence on Posture and Gait during Standing and Walking.

Prolonged gaze at a smartphone is characterized by pronounced flexion of the cervical spine and is associated with health risks. In addition, it is suspected that smartphone distraction could lead to gait changes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to detect smartphone-associated postural changes at thoracic and lumbar levels as well as gait changes. Spinal analysis was performed prospectively in 21 healthy men using the DIERS 4Dmotion®Lab in a controlled crossover design to evaluate posture-associated parameters while standing and walking. The examination sequence provided three randomized gaze directions: GN = Gaze Neutral; S1H = Smartphone one-handed; S2H = Smartphone two-handed. Results reveal a higher vertebra prominens (VP)-flexion in S1H (23.8° ± 6.9°; p ≤ 0.001) and S2H (22.4° ± 4.7°; p ≤ 0.001) compared to GN (17.6° ± 3.8°). Kyphosis angles were also different with higher values observed in S1H (58.8° ± 5.8°; p ≤ 0.001) and S2H (61.6° ± 4.9°; p ≤ 0.001) compared to GN (49.1° ± 4.6°). During walking, similar results were observed in kyphosis angles. No differences were observed in gait during smartphone use (p = 0.180-0.883). The study revealed a significantly increased inclination of the lower cervical and thoracic spine during smartphone use. However, the inclination was larger during S2H. Standing or walking conditions did not affect the measurement outcomes. Long-term smartphone use associated with a larger inclination of the cervical and thoracic spine might result in increased pressure and shear forces acting on vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and muscles, which potentially increases the risk of spinal pain and disease.

Tube Technique with Light-curing Composite for Removing Fractured Root Canal Instruments: Influence of Polymerization Cycles and Mechanical Exposure.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of both polymerization cycles and mechanical exposure procedures on the adhesion of instrument fragments using a modified tube technique with a light-curing composite. METHODS: Eighty Mtwo instruments (size 15.05; VDW, Munich, Germany) were cut at a diameter of 35/100 mm and clamped in a vice with an overlap of 2 mm. Matching cannulas were filled with SDR composite (Dentsply, York, PA) and placed over the instruments. Prime & Bond Active (Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) was used as the bonding material. Glass fiber was inserted from the opposite side into the cannula, and 1, 2, 4, or 6 polymerization cycles of 30 seconds were applied (800 mW/mm2) (n = 20/group). Sixty further identical instruments (n = 20/group) were divided into the following groups: group 1, cut at 10 mm and left unprepared (taper = 5%); group 2, parallelized using diamond instruments (taper = 0%); and group 3, prepared in a way that an inverted conical taper resulted (taper = 2%). Polymerization was performed for 2 minutes. The failure load and mode of failure were determined using a tensile testing device (2 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square test. RESULTS: The failure load increased significantly with the number of polymerization cycles (P < .0001). More than 4 polymerization cycles had no further benefit (P > .05). The failure load in the inverted conical group was significantly lower (P < .0001) compared with the parallel and the unprepared groups. Adhesive failure was significantly more frequent in groups 2 and 3 (20/20) than in group 1 (16/20) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both the number of polymerization cycles and the mechanical exposure procedures had a significant impact on the adhesive force when using the tube technique.